To get a good answer, you must write a good question. Answering a statistics question without context is like boxing blindfolded. You might knock your opponent out, or you might break your hand on the ring post.

What goes into a good question?

1. Tell us the PROBLEM you are trying to solve. That is, the substantive problem, not the statistical aspects.

2. Tell us what math and statistics you know. If you’ve had one course in Introductory Stat, then it won’t make sense for us to give you an answer full of mixed model theory and matrix algebra. On the other hand, if you’ve got several courses or lots of experience, then we can assume you know some basics.

3. Tell us what data you have, where it came from, what is missing, how many variables, what are the Dependent Variables (DVs) and Independent Variables (IVs) – if any, and anything else we need to know about the data. Also tell us which (if any) statistical software you use.

4. Are you thinking of hiring a consultant, or do you just want pointers in some direction?

5. THEN, and ONLY THEN tell us what you’ve tried, why you aren’t happy, and so on.

I specialize in helping graduate students and researchers in psychology, education, economics and the social sciences with all aspects of statistical analysis. Many new and relatively uncommon statistical techniques are available, and these may widen the field of hypotheses you can investigate. Graphical techniques are often misapplied, but, done correctly, they can summarize a great deal of information in a single figure. ** I can help with writing papers, writing grant applications, and doing analysis for grants and research.**

** Specialties:** Regression, logistic regression, cluster analysis, statistical graphics, quantile regression.

You can **click here to email** or reach me via phone at 917-488-7176. Or if you want you can follow me on Facebook, **Twitter**, or LinkedIn.

Statistical Methods for Calculating Vending Machine Refill

Am looking into statics to help support a project I am undertaking. The project scope concerns intelligent replenishment / refill of vending machines.

During an onsite service, a technician must make decisions regarding machine refill to optimise sales for the period leading up to the next refill visit. The vending machines have no call back to base feature.

The technician must…

• maximise sales by specifically stocking and selling those items that demonstrate superior sell through (this may vary over time and seasonally)

• limit the restocking of inventory for high value items like cigarette packets or perishable items involving use by dates so over supply does not occur, but balance this by..

• ensuring sales are not lost through insufficient restocking of inventory items

The statistical model or programmatic code needs to consider the following real world factors…

• Factors impacting short term sales (seasonal factors, gazetted holiday, localised events, machine inventory levels)

• Factors impacting long term sales trends (long term seasonal factors, machine location)

• Sales performance per bay location within a vending machine

• Item properties including use by dates, purchase price, sales price

Was wondering whether a definitive highly accurate statistical method existed to achieve these outcomes? I was planning to construct an array of intelligent algorithms to overcome these parameters with the intent of operation within PDA styled smart client devices.

A colleague suggested modelling data using Poisson regression but I gather that is just a starting point to overcome all the interwoven variables?

Good Day,

I am Zhanar and I am student of MBA. Now I am on the stage of my master thesis research and I have several questions regarding to Factor Analysis steps and SPSS interpretation. I have applied Job Satisfaction Survey in my research I wonder if the steps of my factor analysis is correct. So, I transferred all the data of the survey to SPSS, run factor and received outputs for the interpretation. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy, Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity and Cronbach’s Alpha confirmed the reliability of the data. I have received 5 factors which are ok. However, I have a variable which loads highly two factors at the same time with positive and negative coefficient correlation? How can I interpret this?

And secondly, as soon as SPSS formulated 5 factors with Rotated Component Matrix at the final stage should I make some further analysis per factor?

Thanks in advance for any recommendation and information about my task,

Regards,

Zhanar

It is common that a variable that loads highly on two factors. In the ideal world, each variable would load highly on one and only one factor, but… life is not ideal! It means that that variable is a part of two latent variables or factors. The sign of the loading is fairly arbitrary.

As to further analysis, it depends on your goals and what you are trying to do and so on.

Peter

Is it logical to say that you can increase statistical power by having a highly sensitive outcome measure? I say this because a highly sensitive test has low Type II error, and low Type II error leads to high power. In one of the articles I was reading, the authors’ power analysis revealed that they only needed 6 participants per group, and they believed that it was because their outcome measure was highly sensitive.

I have a moderate level of understanding with statistics (in the context of psychology), and am in my 3rd year of university.

Dear Sir,

I have seen a book example that, Friedman test can be used as a nonparametric analogue of ‘Two way ANOVA without replication’. My question is whether Friedman test can also be used as a nonparametric analogue of ‘Two way ANOVA with replicates data.

Thanks in advance and regards,

Alam

I don’t see why not.

We are two graduate students who got involved in an interesting project focused on cultural values and their influence on social media. The study is focused around 15 hypotheses that we have worded based on our theoretical framework. Since neither of us can be called stat geniuses, though one of us did completely an introductory class on statistics, we’re writing here to ask how to best go about handling the hypothesis testing.

Here is an example of a hypothesis: Low context cultures will use more factual communication than high context cultures

The data is all the textual information across 8 facebook walls throughout the world. The definition of Low/High context cultures is made clear by our theory, and the same goes for factual communication. From here, we have counted the occurrences of factual communication from the walls. This enables us to calculate a frequency for each wall, but this will hardly be substantial enough.

Our question is this. What approach would you suggest taking using descriptive statistics and what approach using inferential statistics?

I hope it makes sense, and thanks in advance!

Best regards, Denmark

Sounds like you could use crosstabulations for descriptive statistics and a bunch of logistic regressions for inferential statistics

Peter

Hi Long, sorry for the late reply, something was wrong with my website. Yes, this is exactly so: A more sensitive outcome measure will increase power, other things being equal.

Peter

Hi Barry

Sorry I did not get to this, something was wrong with my website. Do you still need help? Peter

Hi Yared

Sorry I did not get to this, something was wrong with my website and I didn’t get notified. Do you still need help?

peter

I have obtained a very large odds ratio and standard error for my interaction term (interaction of 2 IVs) after running a binary logistic regression. My study has 4 conditions and 3 dependant variables, however, 1 of the dependent variables is categorical and so I was told by my supervisor to conduct a binary regression for that dv separately while conducting a Manova for the other variables. The dv is a simple yes or no answer to signing up so a fictional follow up study. I have 52 participants. Overall, 44 participants responded yes and 8 responded no. I am aware that the odds ratio may have been so large because I have a very small number in some of my cells. How would I report a very large odds ratio according to apa guidelines in a table? Also, should I run different analysis since my odds ratio is so large? The odds ratio is 6 figures so it is huge! Any help would be appreciated. This is for my undergraduate psychology dissertation.

If you have only 8 people saying “No” then you will probably be overfitting the model with 2 variables plus an interaction. You should really look at only one variable at a time. You quite possibly have quasi-complete or complete separation. So, sorry, but you can’t fit the model you want to the data you have.

Reporting doesn’t vary with the size of the OR.